The numbers don't lie, but they do reveal an uncomfortable truth about who gets backed, and why.

I've learned the hard way not to overlook the need to understanding mums and babies. After all, happy and content mums and babies make for a better world! Let's explore how prioritising their well-being benefits us all.

Enjoy a light-hearted moment with this joke: Why don't babies tell jokes? They're always too busy laughing at us!

Parental health is a £2. 4 trillion opportunity, and Matresa is leading the charge. Founded by Mari-Carmen Sanchez-Morris, Matresadelivers holistic, tech-powered care for mothers and fathers, redefining family wellbeing. Now seeking pilot partners and seed investment, it’s your chance to invest in the future of parental health.

The Reality Check

Here's what the data tells us:

In the UK alone, all-female founder teams raised just 2% of equity investment in 2024, whilst all-male teams secured over 81% of the pot. Globally, female-founded businesses accounted for less than 7% of funded start-ups, with a staggering 1. 2% of VC funding in the MENA region going to women.

The gap widens further when you look at early-stage funding. UK female founders raise an average of £1. 05m in their first five years, compared to £6. 2m for their male counterparts.

But here's where it gets really interesting: it's not just about gender, it's about fit.

The Pattern Behind the Problem

Research from New Power Labs found that female-founded ventures in male-dominated industries raise approximately $2. 1m, versus $21. 8m for male-founded companies in those same sectors. The culprit? A perceived "lack of industry fit" for female founders.

Even more telling: INSEAD research discovered that female-led firms backed only by female VCs were twice as likely to struggle with follow-on funding, due to attribution bias. The thinking goes: "She got funded because she's a woman," rather than "She's competent. "

Meanwhile, many female founders report being asked questions their male peers rarely face: "Do you plan to have children? " "Will you lose interest once you've had a baby? "

The message is clear: the problem isn't competence, it's comfort.

Where the Money Isn't Going

The femtech sector, a brilliant case study, reveals the paradox. Despite 70-80% of companies being female-founded, male-founded femtech ventures raise more capital. Female founders in this space raise 23% less per deal, and research shows that using language like "women's rights" or "empowerment" actually reduces funding probability.

Why? Male investors tend to back problems they understand, problems that feel familiar. Women's health, menstrual issues, menopause? These remain under-funded not because they lack market potential, but because they lack investor familiarity.

One founder shared a telling interaction: "There is a billion-dollar company to be built in this space, but I don't know if you or I know what that is. " Translation: I don't understand this problem, so I won't bet on it.

Why This Happens

The drivers are systemic:

Homophily rules. Investors back founders who look like them, work in industries they know, solve problems they recognise. With most VC decision-makers being male, the pattern repeats.

The "fit" trap. Female founders face harsher scrutiny in male-dominated sectors ("Can she do this? "), whilst male founders face no equivalent challenge when entering female-dominated spaces.

Pitch dynamics differ. Female founders get prevention questions ("How will you avoid failure? "), whilst male founders get growth questions ("How big will you be? "). This shapes perceived potential before a penny is invested.

Networks are smaller. Fewer female VC partners, fewer female angels, less access to mentorship and models of success.

Real-World Evidence

The UK government's "Investing in Women Code," designed to boost investment in women-led businesses, found that 68% of VC deals by signatories still went to male-founded companies.

In 2023, 57 UK femtech companies with all-male teams raised $731m. Meanwhile, 105 companies with all-female teams raised just $408m. More companies, far less capital.

Research by Ludovica Castiglia revealed that femtech firms with women founders were dismissed as "social impact" ventures rather than profit-driven ones, a framing that kills funding conversations before they begin.

What This Means for You

If you're building something in relational health, emotional wellness, women's health, or any space that doesn't fit the traditional VC mould, this isn't just background noise. It's your reality.

The same biases apply. If your problem isn't immediately familiar to those holding the cheque book, you'll face the same "lack of fit" narrative. If your solution centres women's experiences, relational dynamics, or psychological safety, expect to work twice as hard to prove commercial viability.

Framing matters. Lead with market size, ROI, data, and scalability. The social good narrative matters, but it won't win the room alone.

Build your evidence base early. Investor-friendly metrics, proof of concept, customer traction. Make it impossible to ignore.

Over to You

Have you experienced this gap firsthand, as a founder, investor, or observer? What patterns have you noticed? What's working, or what needs to change?

Respond below or repost if this resonates. Let's make the invisible visible.

Thought to Leave You With

We fund what we understand. We understand what we've experienced. And until the people making decisions reflect the breadth of human experience, we'll keep leaving entire categories of innovation, and entire groups of founders, unfunded. The question isn't whether these businesses deserve investment. It's whether we're brave enough to back what we don't yet recognise.

Today's Joke

Why don't VCs invest in empathy algorithms?

Because they can't pattern-match compassion to their portfolio, and the ROI feels. . . too human.

From Complexity to Connection

Even the best businesses can lose alignment. Systems stop talking. Teams drift. And somewhere between strategy and delivery, trust breaks down.

At The Relationship Lab, we help leadership teams deter, detect, and disrupt harm by aligning people, processes, and technology.

Because here's the truth:

People and plans deliver products, but relationships deliver success.

When you design for both secure systems and safe relationships, performance becomes effortless.